AI Teaching Assistant Risks Every School Should Consider

AI Teaching Assistant Risks – What Schools Should Know About

AI is making its way into classrooms across the world, and India is no exception. From lesson planning to student support, many schools are now exploring AI-powered teaching assistants to make learning more efficient and personalised. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has played an important role in this shift. By encouraging digital tools and smarter classroom practices, NEP 2020 has opened the door for schools to adopt AI not just in teaching, but also in everyday administration.

But before jumping in completely, it’s important for schools to slow down and take a closer look. While AI tools offer plenty of advantages, there are also risks that could impact students, teachers, and even school operations. In this article, we’ll walk you through the concerns Indian schools should keep in mind before fully relying on AI teaching assistants.

Learn More About Using AI in Education

Risks of Using AI Teaching Assistants in the Classroom

AI tools that act like Teaching Assistants can definitely help with daily tasks, but they also come with risks that teachers need to be aware of. Let’s take a closer look at them below:

1. Quiet Influence on How Lessons Are Framed

   Some AI tools shape the way lessons are presented by including subtle biases or framing content in a certain way. This can quietly influence how students think without anyone realising it. It becomes especially risky in subjects like history, social science, or ethics, where context and perspective really matter.

2. Too Much Automation, Not Enough Oversight

   Certain AI Teaching Assistants can send out quizzes, lessons, or feedback automatically, with barely any review from you. While that might save time, it also opens the door to errors or misalignment with your teaching goals. This can be a bigger problem for newer teachers who might lean too heavily on the AI without double-checking what it creates.

3. Misuse in Sensitive or High-Stakes Documents

   Some AI tools are capable of drafting sensitive documents like Individual Education Plans (IEPs), special education records, or behaviour reports. The problem is that these tools often lack a detailed understanding of each student’s situation. If the output is too generic or legally incomplete, it can create serious consequences for students and schools alike.

4. Drifting Away from the Curriculum

   If your AI Teaching Assistant isn’t tightly linked to your curriculum or board guidelines, it might start introducing lessons that feel disconnected or out of sequence. Over time, this can throw off the pacing, create overlaps, or skip important foundational concepts. Students may end up confused or frustrated when what they learn from the AI doesn’t match your teaching plan.

5. Blind Trust in AI Suggestions

   When the AI gives feedback, explanations, or even grading advice, it can be tempting to just accept it at face value. But even the best tools can get things wrong, especially in trickier topics. If teachers stop questioning or reviewing what the AI provides, small errors can slip through and create bigger learning issues over time.

6. Wrong Answers that Stick

   Sometimes, AI tools give explanations that sound confident but are actually incorrect. These are called “hallucinations” in the AI world. If students receive wrong feedback and no one catches it, they might start believing those mistakes are true. Once that happens, it’s harder to undo the confusion later on.

7. Cultural and Language Gaps

   Many AI tools are built around standard English or Western content. This means they might ignore local language styles, common Hindi-English mix, or regional examples that Indian students relate to. In diverse classrooms, this lack of cultural or linguistic sensitivity can make students feel left out or misunderstood.

8. Teachers Losing Their Edge

   When teachers start relying too much on AI for planning, feedback, or explanations, they might slowly stop using their own skills in those areas. This is especially true for teachers who aren’t very confident or are under pressure. Over time, this can create a bigger divide between tech-savvy teachers and those who feel left behind.

Key Concerns for Adopting AI in Indian Schools

Here’s a closer look at some of the main concerns for adopting AI in Indian schools:

1. Urban-Rural Divide

   AI in education is growing fast, but the gap between urban and rural schools is still wide. Many private CBSE and ICSE schools are already trying out AI tools for lesson planning and personalised learning. On the other hand, several state-run schools still struggle with basics like computer access, internet connectivity, or trained staff. Until this digital gap is addressed, AI adoption will remain uneven across India’s education system.

2. Policy Gaps

   India still doesn’t have a well-defined policy framework when it comes to using AI in education. Without proper guidelines, schools are mostly relying on private vendors, each pushing their own tools with different goals. This lack of regulation makes it hard to ensure that AI is used in a way that truly supports students and teachers.

3. Equity and Inclusivity

   There’s also the risk that AI could increase the gap between wealthy and under-resourced schools. If only the better-funded schools can afford AI tools, then students in government or rural schools may fall even further behind. That’s the opposite of what education should be aiming for.

4. Monitoring and Accountability

   In India, both parents and administrators often hesitate to bring new technology into classrooms without proper checks. They want to be sure that data is secure, AI recommendations are fair, and there is a clear system for monitoring how the tools are used. Schools need to set up transparent reporting and accountability processes before making AI a regular part of teaching.

Responsible Use of AI in Classrooms

AI can be a great help in schools, but only when it’s used with care. Here’s how to make sure it supports learning, instead of taking over the classroom.

1. Hybrid Approach

   AI should never replace a teacher. It works best as a supporting tool that helps with tasks like grading, quiz generation, or tracking student progress. Let the teacher lead, and let AI help behind the scenes.

2. Teacher Training

   Schools should work with the government and EdTech platforms to organise workshops on AI literacy. Teachers need hands-on training to understand how to use AI responsibly and to feel confident in using it as part of their teaching plan.

3. Parental Involvement

   Parents play an important role too. Schools should talk to parents about how AI tools are being used and how to supervise them at home. This way, students don’t become too dependent on tech and continue learning in a balanced environment.

4. Safe Guidelines

   Any AI tool used in school must follow transparent data policies. It should also be aligned with ethical practices and designed in a way that respects cultural and regional differences. This makes sure students are learning in a way that feels relevant and safe.

How Extramarks Can Help

Extramarks is built to support teachers every step of the way. From AI-powered assessments and smart lesson planning to instant insights on student performance, everything is designed to make teaching simpler and more impactful. You get tools that save time, reduce routine workload, and help you focus more on actual teaching. Whether you’re in a traditional classroom or trying blended learning, Extramarks brings practical, teacher-first AI solutions that fit right into your daily flow.

Closing Thoughts

AI teaching assistants can make classrooms smarter, but they should never replace the human touch that real teaching brings. Technology can guide, support, and simplify, but it cannot understand a child’s emotions, struggles, or potential the way a teacher can. As schools move forward with AI, the focus should stay on balance, training, and trust. With the right checks in place, AI can become a partner in learning rather than a risk to it.

Last Updated on November 10, 2025