CBSE class 10 political science chapter 1 notes cover Power-Sharing from NCERT Democratic Politics II, Reprint 2026-27. Power-sharing is a system in which political power is distributed among different organs, levels, or groups of government so that no single entity can exercise unchecked authority. The chapter uses Belgium and Sri Lanka as two contrasting case studies to explain why sharing power preserves democracy and refusing it destroys it.
This chapter carries high weightage in the 2026 CBSE board exam. Students who understand the Belgium and Sri Lanka contrast, know the prudential and moral reasons for power sharing, and can explain all four forms will handle most board questions with confidence. These civics class 10 chapter 1 notes cover every scored topic with summaries, key terms, comparison tables, and question answers. Use these class 10 power sharing notes alongside CBSE Class 10 Social Science Syllabus to confirm what is in scope and use Important Questions Class 10 for exam practice.
Key Takeaways
| Topic |
What to Know |
| Chapter |
Power-Sharing |
| Book |
NCERT Democratic Politics II, Class 10 (Reprint 2026-27) |
| Case study 1 |
Belgium — accommodation, constitution amended 4 times (1970–1993) |
| Case study 2 |
Sri Lanka — majoritarianism led to civil war (ended 2009) |
| Prudential reason |
Reduces conflict, ensures stability |
| Moral reason |
Power sharing is the spirit of democracy |
| Form 1 |
Horizontal — among organs of government |
| Form 2 |
Vertical — among levels of government |
| Form 3 |
Among social groups |
| Form 4 |
Among political parties and pressure groups |
Overview of Class 10 Civics Chapter 1 Notes
These class 10 civics chapter 1 notes follow the NCERT chapter structure exactly. The chapter opens with the stories of Belgium and Sri Lanka, draws lessons about why power sharing is desirable, and then explains the four forms of power sharing.
Students who understand the Belgium–Sri Lanka contrast and can name and explain all four forms will handle most board questions from this chapter with confidence.
Also check Class 10 Political Science Revision Notes for all chapters together.
Power Sharing Class 10 Summary
Belgium chose to share power between its Dutch-speaking and French-speaking communities through a federal model amended four times between 1970 and 1993. Sri Lanka chose majoritarianism. The Sinhala majority passed laws that marginalised Tamils, leading to a civil war that ended only in 2009.
The chapter draws one clear lesson from both: refusing to share power destroys national unity, while sharing power builds it. Power sharing is desirable for two reasons. Prudential: it reduces conflict. Moral: it is the spirit of democracy.
Modern democracies share power in four ways: horizontally among government organs, vertically among government levels, among social groups, and among political parties and movements.
What is Power Sharing Class 10?
Power sharing emerged in opposition to the old idea that all government power must rest with one person or group in one place. That older view held that concentrated power enables quick decisions. Democracy changed this thinking entirely.
In a democracy, people are the source of all political power. Everyone must have a voice in shaping public policies. Political power must therefore be shared among as many citizens as possible.
Belgium and Sri Lanka
Belgium is a small country in Europe, smaller than the state of Haryana, with a population of just over one crore. Its ethnic composition is complex: 59% live in the Flemish region and speak Dutch, 40% live in the Wallonia region and speak French, and 1% speak German.
In the capital Brussels, 80% speak French and 20% speak Dutch. The minority French-speaking community was relatively rich and powerful. The Dutch-speaking community, which got the benefits of economic development and education much later, resented this.
Sri Lanka is an island nation just off the southern coast of Tamil Nadu with a population of about two crore. The major social groups are Sinhala-speakers (74%) and Tamil-speakers (18%). Most Sinhala-speaking people are Buddhists; most Tamils are Hindus or Muslims. About 7% are Christians from both communities.
Majoritarianism in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka became independent in 1948. The leaders of the Sinhala community sought to secure dominance over government by virtue of their majority. The democratically elected government adopted a series of majoritarian measures:
- In 1956, an Act was passed recognising Sinhala as the only official language, disregarding Tamil entirely
- Governments followed preferential policies that favoured Sinhala applicants for university positions and government jobs
- A new constitution stipulated that the state shall protect and foster Buddhism
These measures increased the feeling of alienation among Sri Lankan Tamils step by step. They felt the constitution and government policies denied them equal political rights, discriminated against them in jobs and education, and ignored their interests.
Sri Lankan Tamils launched parties and struggles for recognition of Tamil as an official language, regional autonomy, and equality of opportunity. Their demands were repeatedly denied. By the 1980s, several political organisations demanded an independent Tamil Eelam in the north and east of Sri Lanka.
Distrust turned into a civil war: a violent conflict between opposing groups within a country so intense it appears like a war. Thousands from both communities were killed. Many families fled as refugees. The civil war ended in 2009, but its damage to Sri Lanka's social, cultural, and economic life was severe.
Accommodation in Belgium
Belgium's leaders took a different path. They recognised regional differences and cultural diversities and worked out mutually acceptable arrangements. Between 1970 and 1993, they amended their constitution four times.
The Belgian model has these key elements:
Equal ministers in the Central Government: The constitution prescribes equal numbers of Dutch and French-speaking ministers. Some special laws require majority support from each linguistic group. No single community can make decisions unilaterally.
State Governments are independent: Many powers of the Central Government were given to State Governments of the two regions. State Governments are not subordinate to the Central Government.
Separate government for Brussels: Brussels has a separate government in which both communities have equal representation. French-speaking people accepted equal representation in Brussels because the Dutch-speaking community accepted equal representation in the Central Government.
Community government: A third kind of government exists, elected by people belonging to one language community regardless of where they live. It has power over cultural, educational, and language-related issues.
The Belgian model is complicated, but it worked. It helped avoid civic strife and a possible division of the country on linguistic lines. When European countries formed the European Union, Brussels was chosen as its headquarters.
Belgium vs Sri Lanka: Key Difference
| Point |
Belgium |
Sri Lanka |
| Majority community |
Dutch-speaking (59%) |
Sinhala-speaking (74%) |
| Action taken |
Shared power through accommodation |
Imposed majoritarian policies |
| Effect on minority |
Protected through equal representation |
Alienated, rights denied |
| Result |
Avoided division, unity maintained |
Civil war, ended 2009 |
| Lesson |
Respecting all communities preserves democracy |
Majority dominance destroys national unity |
Why is Power Sharing Desirable?
Two sets of reasons explain why power sharing is desirable. The NCERT chapter calls these prudential and moral.
Prudential reasons: Power sharing reduces the possibility of conflict between social groups. Social conflict often leads to violence and political instability. Imposing the will of the majority community over others may seem attractive in the short run but undermines national unity in the long run.
Moral reasons: Power sharing is the very spirit of democracy. A democratic rule involves sharing power with those affected by its exercise. People have a right to be consulted on how they are governed. A legitimate government is one where citizens, through participation, acquire a stake in the system.
Prudential reasons stress that power sharing brings better outcomes. Moral reasons emphasise that the very act of power sharing is valuable in itself.
Forms of Power Sharing Class 10 Notes
The four forms of power sharing are the backbone of this chapter and the most directly tested section in 2026 CBSE board exams.
Form 1: Among different organs of government (Horizontal distribution)
Power is shared among the legislature, executive, and judiciary. This is called horizontal distribution because different organs placed at the same level exercise different powers. No organ can exercise unlimited power. Each organ checks the others through the system of checks and balances.
In India, ministers and government officials exercise power but are responsible to Parliament or State Assemblies. Although judges are appointed by the executive, they can check the functioning of the executive or laws made by the legislature.
Form 2: Among governments at different levels (Vertical distribution)
Power is shared between a general government for the entire country and governments at the provincial or regional level. In India, this means Central Government and State Governments. The constitution clearly lays down the powers of different levels. This is called the federal division of power.
The same principle extends to levels below the State government: municipality and panchayat. Division of powers involving higher and lower levels is called vertical division of power.
Form 3: Among different social groups
Power can be shared among religious and linguistic groups. Belgium's community government is the best example. In some countries, constitutional and legal arrangements ensure that socially weaker sections and women are represented in legislatures and administration.
In India, the system of reserved constituencies serves this purpose. This arrangement gives minority communities a fair share in power.
Form 4: Among political parties, pressure groups and movements
In a democracy, citizens must have freedom to choose among various contenders for power. Competition among different parties ensures power does not remain in one hand. When two or more parties form an alliance and win elections, they form a coalition government and share power.
Interest groups including traders, businessmen, industrialists, farmers, and workers also influence governmental power through participation in governmental committees or by influencing the decision-making process.
Important Terms in Power Sharing
| Term |
Meaning |
| Ethnic |
A social division based on shared culture; common descent due to physical type or culture |
| Majoritarianism |
A belief that the majority community should rule in whatever way it wants, disregarding minority wishes |
| Civil war |
A violent conflict between opposing groups within a country, so intense it appears like a war |
| Prudential |
Based on careful calculation of gains and losses; contrasted with purely moral decisions |
| Horizontal distribution |
Power shared among organs of government at the same level |
| Vertical distribution |
Power shared between higher and lower levels of government |
| Checks and balances |
A system where each organ of government checks the others |
| Federal government |
A general government for the entire country; Central or Union Government in India |
| Coalition government |
A government formed when two or more parties form an alliance and win elections together |
| Community government |
A third tier in Belgium, elected by one language community, handles cultural and language issues |
Power Sharing Class 10 Question Answers
Q1. What are the different forms of power sharing? Give an example of each.
Among organs of government: legislature, executive, and judiciary share power through checks and balances. Example: In India, the Supreme Court can strike down laws made by Parliament.
Among governments at different levels: Central and State Governments in India share power through the federal structure.
Among social groups: reserved constituencies for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in India; community government in Belgium.
Among political parties and pressure groups: coalition governments; in India, many state governments are formed by coalitions.
Q2. State one prudential reason and one moral reason for power sharing with an Indian example.
Prudential: Power sharing reduces the possibility of conflict between communities. In India, reserved constituencies ensure Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes have representation in legislatures, reducing alienation and potential conflict.
Moral: Power sharing is the spirit of democracy. India's Panchayati Raj system gives people at the village level a direct stake in governance. It restores power to where it belongs in a democracy — the hands of the people.
Q3. Match the forms of power sharing with their government types.
From the NCERT exercise:
- Power shared among different organs of government: B. Separation of powers
- Power shared among governments at different levels: D. Federal government
- Power shared by different social groups: A. Community government
- Power shared by two or more political parties: C. Coalition government
Answer: (c) B D A C
Q4. Which statements about Belgium and Sri Lanka are correct?
From the NCERT exercise: Statement B (Sri Lanka's government sought to ensure Sinhala dominance), Statement C (Tamils in Sri Lanka demanded a federal arrangement of power sharing), and Statement D (Belgium's transformation to a federal system prevented division on linguistic lines) are correct.
Statement A is incorrect. It was not the Dutch-speaking majority that tried to impose its domination in Belgium. It was the French-speaking minority that was relatively rich and powerful, which caused resentment among the Dutch-speaking community.
Answer: (d) B, C and D